Barack Obama Shines On Fox News Interview

Barack Obama did a wonderful job of presenting himself and his plans for America after he is elected president, to Chris Wallace on Fox News this morning.

He came across as articulate, genial, intelligent, caring and willing to work together with all people. He handled all of Chris Wallace's questions with ease. He showed how difficult it will be for John McCain to debate him on important policy issues, including the old saw that Democrats just want to "tax and spend".

Personally I think that "tax and spend" is better than just "spend" which is what we've been doing for the last 7 years; building up deficits.

In 2004 John McCain said, when asked about George Bush's tax plan, "I voted against the tax cuts because of the disproportional amount that went to the wealthiest Americans. I would clearly support not extending those tax cuts in order to help address the deficit." - however now that it is politically expedient he says he will keep those tax cuts in place.

When talking about the disparities in the Bush tax system recently Warren Buffett, who opposed the Bush tax tax plan was it was first proposed, said that his effective federal income tax rate is 17.7% while his receptionist is in the 30% bracket, and he doesn't think that's right.

You can't get something for nothing - we don't ask our government to provide social security, medical care, a military, repair our aging infrastructure, give people who would not otherwise have a chance at a higher education a chance with low interest loans and grants; without taxes. If you are a hard core Libertarian who thinks "the government's responsibilities should be limited to the protection of individual rights from the initiation of force and fraud", then vote for Ron Paul. We might not have schools, roads, or social security - but you get what you pay for.

Here's the straight skinny on the tax discussion -

Barack talked about his proposal to roll back the long term capital gains tax reductions that were put in place by George W. Bush. Returning the capital gains tax rate to what it was during the Reagan administration will not increase taxes for working class Americans because capital gains are not taxable in 401K plans.

Neither Obama or McCain are talking about increasing the short term capital gains tax. Short term capital gains are currently taxed at the same rate as income (25%) for what I'll call average Americans. A short term gain means you buy and sell a stock within a year, and make a profit. This has no impact on 401K plans, since the money you accrue in those accounts will be taxed at your regular income tax rate when you retire.

Long term capital gains are currently taxed at 15% for average Americans. That sounds pretty good since it's 10% less than the 25% rate that would apply if that capital gain was treated as income.

The real issue is that long term capital gains for individuals come in the form of dividends paid on stock you hold for more than a year, and dividends tend to be in the 4% annual range. Assume you happen to have $100,000 in a stock that pays a 4% dividend; you will have a $4,000 capital gain that would be taxed at 15%, and under Obama's plan might be taxed at 20% or maybe even gasp! 28% which is what they were under Ronald Reagan's, Tax Reform Act of 1986.

Lets do the arithmetic.

At 15% your tax bill will be 600 bucks, at 20% it's $800 and at 28% it's $1120.

So what Barack is talking about for this theoretical middle class American family making $65,000 to $135,000 a year is an extra 200 to 520 dollars in taxes per year....assuming they have been able to invest $100,000 in stocks outside of a 401K plan.

For the average working class American returning the long term capital gains tax to what it was during the Reagan years will not increase your taxes. The additional revenue will help reduce the budget deficits that will be passed on to our children, and ensure that the wealthiest Americans pay their fair share.

Assume you have $1,000,000 in stocks outside a 401K; then the tax bill on your 4% dividend goes from $6,000 today for the 15% case to $11,200 with the long term capital gains increase to 28%. You can see the point - as an individual you only care about the capital gains tax if you have a lot of capital gains; in the million(s) - for the vast majority of Americans this is obviously not the case.

The second point that they covered on taxes was Barack's plan to do away with the cap on the Social Security payroll tax.

For most of us - again this is a don't care - at least from the standpoint of higher taxes (they won't be higher). However it's a huge issue if we would like to have Social Security Benefits available when we retire.

According to the Social Security Administration, in 2008 the cap on social security payroll taxes applies for people with annual incomes above $102,000. If you make less than $102,000 you pay the full tax, anything you make above $102,000 is not subject to social security payroll taxes.

Warren Buffett knows something about economics and he agrees with Barack Obama on doing away with the social security payroll tax cap for people making over $102,000 a year. The option is to keep spending without taxing, running up big bills that we will leave for the next generation of Americans to deal with - and that just doesn't seem fair.

Eton S350DL

I'm looking forward to my new radio coming this week. It's an AM/FM/Shortwave (2.9 to 27.4 Mhz) that runs on AC power, D Cells or AA Cells. It has a 4 inch speaker and jacks for external antennas. It's branded with the Eton label and made by Grundig. I like it because it has a lot of knobs, switches and buttons.

I ordered mine from Universal Radio in Reynoldsburg, Ohio. These radios are also available from Amazon, Cabela's and at Target (online only).

I've had a few shortwave radios over the years - two Hallicrafters and an Allied that I built from a kit when I was 10. It's fun to see what you can pick up with a shortwave and I'm looking forward to having better AM sensitivity so I can listen to 1090 in Seattle.

How The Extended Primary Helps the Democratic Party

Contrary to what some people think - the extended primary season is helping, rather than hurting, Barack Obama's chances to be elected President.

It is doing several things that help Barack Obama -

• Giving him a chance to polish up his responses to policy questions and political attacks which are sure to come
  

• Allowing him an opportunity to reflect on how best to present his points of view so as to appeal to the widest base of voters
  

• Hillary Clinton, with lots of help from cable news, is turning emotionally charged "exciting" but generally meaningless talking points into "old news" by fall.

The end result is that this fall the easily flummoxed John McCain will get a chance to debate issues that are important to American citizens with one of the most articulate people we've seen in politics in decades. We won't be seeing a repeat of the ABC debate, where 45 minutes went by before a substantial policy issue was discussed.

Barack Obama will have a chance to tease out and clarify what John McCain and the Republican party have to offer working class Americans in the future. We've already seen what they had to offer in the past and thoughtful people know we need fundamental change.

There will still be plenty of non-issue character assassination and guilt by association and inference for people who like the tabloid style of journalism.

After Barack Obama is chosen as the Democratic nominee the 527 Groups will start to crank up their machines and barrage voters with sleazy attack ads.

Barack Obama's youth and relative lack of experience as a politician give him an advantage compared to John McCain who's lived long enough and been in politics long enough to provide fodder for the sleeze providers. Many of the negative stories about McCain, which came out in his campaign in 2000 against George Bush, will be "new" to today's voters and that's a problem for him, since he will be trying to distance himself both from those stories and the last eight years of the Bush administration....while simultaneously trying to match wits with the elite (in a good way) Barack Obama.

The Boss Endorses Obama

From Bruce Springsteen News -

"Dear Friends and Fans:

LIke most of you, I've been following the campaign and I have now seen and heard enough to know where I stand. Senator Obama, in my view, is head and shoulders above the rest.

He has the depth, the reflectiveness, and the resilience to be our next President. He speaks to the America I've envisioned in my music for the past 35 years, a generous nation with a citizenry willing to tackle nuanced and complex problems, a country that's interested in its collective destiny and in the potential of its gathered spirit. A place where "...nobody crowds you, and nobody goes it alone."

At the moment, critics have tried to diminish Senator Obama through the exaggeration of certain of his comments and relationships. While these matters are worthy of some discussion, they have been ripped out of the context and fabric of the man's life and vision, so well described in his excellent book, Dreams from My Father, often in order to distract us from discussing the real issues: war and peace, the fight for economic and racial justice, reaffirming our Constitution, and the protection and enhancement of our environment.

After the terrible damage done over the past eight years, a great American reclamation project needs to be undertaken. I believe that Senator Obama is the best candidate to lead that project and to lead us into the 21st Century with a renewed sense of moral purpose and of ourselves as Americans.

Over here on E Street, we're proud to support Obama for President."

Bruce Springsteen

Algae - Fuel and Food

I've been thinking about Algae lately. It's pretty exciting.

Algae is a promising source of fuel and food.

Studying algae as an alternative fuel source is not a new project, however it has become a more financially attractive project now that oil prices are high - according to the DOE Biomass Program Archives -

"From 1978 to 1996, the U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Fuels Development funded a program to develop renewable transportation fuels from algae. The main focus of the program, know as the Aquatic Species Program (or ASP) was the production of biodiesel from high lipid-content algae grown in ponds, utilizing waste CO2 from coal fired power plants. Over the almost two decades of this program, tremendous advances were made in the science of manipulating the metabolism of algae and the engineering of microalgae algae production systems."

Algae may be a better alternative than using traditional food crops for fuel. We're figuring out that growing corn or soybeans to produce ethanal or biodiesel might not be such a great idea given the impact on global food supplies/prices, the tendency for farmers in developing countries to cut down rain forests or otherwise clear land to grow these crops and the fact that ethanol production using corn uses as much energy as it provides and therefore needs government price supports to be economically viable.

The Clean Energy Scam - TIME

It's reassuring to think about all the new job opportunities, ranging from research and development, to hands-on farming and building projects - as we shift from an oil-based economy to alternatives like wind, wave, solar and algae-based fuels.

Patriotic Songs From The Library of Congress

The Library of Congress Performing Arts Encyclopedia has a selection of Patriotic Melodies available in mp3 or real audio format, with the historical background of each song and in some cases the sheet music.

The site says,

"These are songs that have now become part of the American national heritage. A combination of hymns, national songs, music of the theater, radio and television, military themes, and poetry, all of this music demonstrates that while over history many things have changed, this expression of pride and hope remain a constant part of the American experience."

The songs include -

* America the Beautiful
* Anchors Aweigh
* The Army Goes Rolling Along
* Battle Hymn of the Republic
* Columbia the Gem of the Ocean
* Eternal Father, Strong to Save
* Fanfare for the Common Man
* God Bless America
* Hail Columbia
* Hail to the Chief
* I'll Be Home for Christmas
* Library of Congress March
* Marines' Hymn
* My Country 'Tis of Thee
* Of Thee I Sing
* Over There
* Semper Paratus
* Star Spangled Banner
* Stars and Stripes Forever
* This Land is Your Land
* This is My Country
* U.S. Air Force Song
* When Johnny Comes Marching Home Again
* Yankee Doodle
* The Yankee Doodle Boy
* Victory at Sea
* You're a Grand Old Flag

It's touching to imagine the circumstances surrounding people as they listened to songs, like "I'll Be Home For Christmas" sung by Bing Crosby, or Aaron Copland's "Fanfare For The Common Man" in 1943 - the height of World War II.

Woody Guthrie wrote "This Land is Your Land" in 1940 near the end of the Great Depression. According to the site he wrote the song, "...in reaction to Irving Berlin's song "God Bless America." Guthrie heard Berlin's song repeatedly while he traveled cross-country and became increasingly annoyed that it glossed over the lop-sided distribution of land and wealth that he was observing and had experienced as a child."

I love a lot of these songs and I appreciate the fact that "patriotic" songs can range from "God Bless America" to Woody Guthrie's song proclaiming -

Nobody living can ever stop me
As I go walking my Freedom Highway
Nobody living can make me turn back
This land was made for you and me.

The Tippety Tappity Tip Tip Tip Song

I ran across this video while reading a Newsweek.com article about Video on Flickr! and thought it was pretty cute.


Tippity Tappity Tippy Tap Click from Charlie B Catt on Vimeo

Tulips and Grape Hyacinth

Tulips and grape hyacinth are starting to bloom in Everett. You can click on the small images to see the full size.




I'm really looking forward to this weekend since it's supposed to get into the 60's and we get to go see the Dalai Lama at Quest Field as part of the Seeds of Compassion : 5-Day Gathering in Seattle

Waiting to Attack?

From the "what some people will do to occupy their time" file.

I was working from home on Monday and during a break I decided to put some googly eyes on a gourd I have. I couldn't find a spare pair of googly eyes so I had to make some out of paper.

I've been thinking about googly eyes since last Saturday when I saw the Googly Eyes Gardener on SNL. If you like Christopher Walken's humor this SNL-Census skit is pretty funny too.

Picasa Web Albums - Jack - Orcas2008

I put the pictures I took the last few days on Picasa Web Albums - Jack - Orcas2008.

These are a few of them -

Orcas2008 109
Originally uploaded by yustyack

Orcas2008 137
Originally uploaded by yustyack

Orcas2008 126
Originally uploaded by yustyack

Green Festival 2008 - Seattle, Chicago, Washington DC and San Francisco

The Seattle Green Festival is April 12th and 13th at the Convention Center.

From the Green Festival Website -

"At Green Festivals, we’re celebrating what’s working in our communities—for people, business and the environment. Here, green means safe, healthy communities and a strong local economy.

Join us at the nation’s premier sustainability events, where you will see the very best in green. You’ll enjoy more than 125 renowned authors, leaders and educators; great how-to workshops; cutting-edge films; fun activities for kids; organic beer and wine; delicious vegetarian cuisine and diverse live music. Shop in our unique marketplace of more than 300 eco-friendly businesses—everything from all-natural body care products and organic cotton clothing to Fair Trade gifts and beautiful kitchen tiles made from renewable resources."

The Death and Life of the American Newspaper

The March 31st issue of The New Yorker has an article by Eric Alterman about the future of media as we move toward decentralized personalized sources of information.

Historically newspapers and the network nightly news attempted to provide information without promoting a political position - assuming that informed citizens are capable of coming to their own conclusions and thereby taking advantage of one benefit of living in a free society.

We tend to be lazy though...

It takes intellectual effort to sift thorough differing points of view and come up with, and articulate, our own world view. It's easier to let someone else tell us what to think using small simplistic sound bites. Bush is an idiot, Hillary's a liar, Obama's a bigot, Rush Limbaugh is a big fat liar...etc.

Things are never that simple, and once we descend into that sort of dialogue we demean ourselves and in some sense the people who sacrificed so much to give us freedom.

No one knows where the current state of media leads us, but it's hard to imagine an informed citizenry without paid news journalists. Some newspapers have experimented with allowing readers to provide comments on news stories in an attempt to keep pace with the news-aggregators, who use intellectual property from newspapers without having to share in the cost of creating that content. In a quote from the New Yorker article, Eric Alterman writes,

"The Chicago Tribune recently felt compelled to shut down comment boards on its Web site for all political news stories. Its public editor, Timothy J. McNulty, complained, not without reason, that “the boards were beginning to read like a community of foul-mouthed bigots.”"

In some ways the internet is akin to amateur radio. In the days before citizen band radio the only people who were allowed to broadcast had to have an FCC license. This meant they had to follow a set of rules and agreed to be use a call sign that uniquely identified them. When CB radio came into being anyone could talk and had complete anonymity.

There's something about human nature that leads people to act differently when they can't be identified (think about how you might act in your car if you are upset with another driver vs. how you might act if that same person was face to face with you). This led to a decline in what was going over the airwaves to the point that CB radio became useless for conversation and became a place for swearing and inane chatter. I'm basing this on a small sample of CB radio I listened to in a city years ago. Maybe it's different on the interstate where truckers use it.

The point is that anonymity is not conducive to conversation. A real conversation would require I know something about who you are and what your background is. Absent that I'm not interested in what you have to say - why should I be for all I know I'm having An Internet Chat with Koko the Gorilla.

Ubuntu - How To Add DVD Playback Capability

web 009
Originally uploaded by Jack Crossen

If you running Ubuntu 7.10 Linux and can't get a DVD to play, the Ubuntu Wiki has a simple solution that worked for me.


You need a working internet connection before proceeding.


Run the following script from the command line -

sudo /usr/share/doc/libdvdread3/install-css.sh

If that doesn't work, run the script below, then run the script above again -

sudo apt-get install libdvdread3

If you get messages that the css key can not be found you may set the regioncode of your optical drive -

sudo apt-get install regionset

sudo regionset

Then follow the instructions...

In case you were wondering, in this context, css is an acronym for Content Scramble System an encryption system used on DVD's. It is intended to prevent you from making a copy or downloading a DVD to your hard drive.

CSS was reverse-engineered/cracked by, among other people, a young self-taught software programmer from Norway by the name of Jon Lech Johansen. He was arrested for computer hacking in 2002 after a complaint by the US DVD Copy Control Association (DVD-CCA) and the Motion Picture Association (MPA) but was later acquitted in an Oslo court. The people that defeated CSS were looking for ways to play DVD's using the Linux operating system.

Jon Lech Johansen keeps a blog at nanocr.eu.

Now I can watch the Battlestar Galactica season 2 and 3 DVD's I rented, without having to boot up Windows.

Blackberry Beach - Orcas Island

Betsy and I are spending some time at Blackberry Beach on Orcas Island this week.

It's a nice spot - very quiet, except for some birds singing, with beautiful views of the water. Blackberry Beach is on the East side of Orcas Island and pretty much off the beaten path.

It's a nice place to take a break.

I'm listening to the Mariners win their first baseball game of the season and Betsy's down at the beach, looking for beach glass.

Looking forward to a nice relaxing week...

25th Annual Skagit Valley Tulip Festival

The 25th Annual Skagit Valley Tulip Festival officially runs from April 1st to April 30th.

It's been a pretty cold spring so far, and according to the bloom map the tulip and iris fields are not showing any color, however the daffodils are in bloom.

Betsy and I are going to Orcas Island tomorrow so I'll get a chance to have a look at the fields on the way up and see first hand what the flowers look like.

_____________________________________

Wondering Why Gas Is So Expensive?

The "Energy Policy Conservation Act," (EPCA) was enacted into law in 1975 during Gerald Ford's administration. The act established the Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards for passenger cars and light trucks.

Jimmy Carter advanced a plan in 1981 that called for fuel efficiency standards to reach 48 mpg by 1995.

In an interesting footnote to history - in 1981 the auto industry said it could meet a 30 mpg fuel economy by 1985, but the Federal Government as of today (23 years later) has only mandated 27.5 mpg.

The Reagan Administration withdrew the plan put forth by Carter and in 1986 rolled the standard back to 26 mpg.

There were no improvements in the CAFE standards under the first Bush Administration or the Clinton Administration, and the Bush/Cheney Administration has done nothing to raise the standards for cars, although there have been some minor improvements in the standards for small trucks (see attached data from the Department of Transportation for details).

In 2002, Senators John Kerry, and John McCain offered a plan that called for fuel economy standards for cars and light trucks, beginning with model year 2005, to reach a combined average fuel economy standard of at least 36 miles per gallon by 2015 (recall that Jimmy Carter's plan was for 48 miles per gallon by 1995). The Kerry McCain plan was never implemented, and the federally mandated average fleet efficiency levels in new vehicles are the same as they were in 1985.

Since a variety of administrations and Congresses have been unwilling to address this, the market will take care of it, and it will be painful for working class Americans.

The price of oil may decline as American demand subsides because people can't afford to drive, but there's no guarantee as China, India and other developing nations compete for global oil. Working people who can afford to buy newer more fuel efficient vehicles will do that. Working people who can't buy a more fuel efficient vehicle will have to decide what their priorities are and that could become quite painful.

Reference: Spinning Wheels - Our Continual Refusal to Raise CAFE Standards

______________________________

From the article by Robert F. Kennedy Junior Better Gas Mileage, Greater Security -

"According to a recent report by Amory Lovins of the Rocky Mountain Institute, if the United States had continued to conserve oil at the rate it did in the period from 1976 to 1985, it would no longer have needed Persian Gulf oil after 1985. Had we continued this wise course, we might not have had to fight the Persian Gulf war, and we would have insulated ourselves from price shocks in the international oil market. Fuel efficiency is a sound national energy policy, economic policy and foreign policy all wrapped into one. Every increase of one mile per gallon in auto fuel efficiency yields more oil than is in two Arctic National Wildlife Refuges. An improvement right now of 2.7 miles per gallon would eliminate our need for all Persian Gulf oil!"

______________________________

Some CAFE details from the Department of Transportation -

• For what years and at what levels have the passenger car CAFE standards been set?
  

"To meet the goal of doubling the 1974 passenger car fuel economy average by 1985 (to 27.5 mpg), Congress set fuel economy standards for some of the intervening years. Passenger car standards were established for MY 1978 (18 mpg); MY 1979 (19 mpg); MY 1980 (20 mpg); and for MY 1985 and thereafter (27.5 mpg). Congress left the level of 1981-84 standards to the Department to establish administratively. Subsequently, standards of 22, 24, 26, and 27 mpg were established. For the post-1985 period, Congress provided for the continued application of the 27.5 mpg standard for passenger cars, but gave the Department the authority to set higher or lower standards. From MY 1986 through 1989, the passenger car standards were lowered. Thereafter, in MY 1990, the passenger car standard was amended to 27.5 mpg, which it has remained at this level."

• For what years and at what levels have the light truck CAFE standards been set?

"Congress did not specify a target for the improvement of light truck fuel economy. Instead, it provided that light truck standards be set at the maximum feasible level for model year 1979 and each model year thereafter. Unlike for the passenger car fleet, there is no default standard established for light trucks. NHTSA must set the standard for each model future model year. Light truck fuel economy standards have been established by NHTSA for MY 1979 through MY 2007."

"Light truck fuel economy requirements were first established for MY 1979 (17.2 mpg for 2-wheel drive models; 15.8 mpg for 4-wheel drive). Standards for MY 1979 light trucks were established for vehicles with a gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) of 6,000 pounds or less. Standards for MY 1980 and beyond are for light trucks with a GVWR of 8,500 pounds or less. The light truck standard progressively increased from MY 1979 to 20.7 mpg and 19.1 mpg, respectively, by MY 1991. From MY 1982 through 1991, manufacturers were allowed to comply by either combining 2- and 4-wheel drive fleets or calculating their fuel economy separately. In MY 1992, the 2- and 4-wheel drive fleet distinction was eliminated, and fleets were required to meet a standard of 20.2 mpg. The standard progressively increased until 1996, when the Appropriations prohibition froze the requirement at 20.7 mpg. The freeze was lifted by Congress on December 18, 2001. On March 31, 2003, NHTSA issued new light truck standards, setting a standard of 21.0 mpg for MY 2005, 21.6 mpg for MY 2006, and 22.2 mpg for MY 2007."

John McCain's Has No Plans to Help People Get a College Education

I was reading John McCain's election webpage to see where he stands on the issues I consider important as a working class American.

He's got a fair amount on protecting our right to keep and bear assault weapons, and rolling back Roe v. Wade, but nothing on helping young people get a college, or other post-secondary, education.

According to the TG: Legislative Report: February 20, 2008

"The likely Republican nominee, Arizona Senator John McCain, has no stated position on the federal role in providing, or even promoting, access to postsecondary education. Aside from (but also including to a significant degree) the high profile issues of health insurance, Medicare, and Social Security, the traditional and historical position of the Republican Party is that the federal role in providing support for domestic education, health and human service, and job programs should be as limited as possible. And entitlement programs should be as limiting as politically possible. It is likely that the cost of the two major student loan programs would be a major consideration, with performance another factor. This is borne out by the results of the annual program evaluations of the current Office of Management and Budget Program Assessment and Rating Tool (PART) of the FFELP and FDLP."

It's interesting to compare John McCain's non-position, with the variety of ideas Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton have provided to help ensure our nation provides young people an opportunity to get a college, or other post-secondary, education.

It would be helpful if the talking heads on network news shows would stop talking about Hillary vs. Obama and discuss John McCain's positions (or lack of positions) and how they compare to either Hillary or Obama's.

Having people's attention diverted from the real issues, gives John McCain a free ride for now, but after the presidential debates start and people get a chance to compare John McCain side by side with Barack Obama, that free ride could very well turn into a free fall.

________________________________

Postscript - June 1, 2008

When I wrote John McCain has information on his website about protecting our right to keep and bear assault weapons, I didn't mean to imply I don't support the second amendment right of law abiding citizens to keep and bear arms. What I do believe is that the issue of people in the U.S. not having access to all the guns they want is pretty much being taken

Actually the second amendment doesn't say "law-abiding citizens"it says "the right of the People to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed" so if we were strict constitionalists we would have to say criminal type people have the right to arm themselves, which is pretty much the way things have worked out.

I'd be in favor of a law that limits gun ownership to those who hunt or use them for target shooting, but given the number of guns we have in our society there is no law that is going to keep them out of the hands of bad people who don't obey the law. Depending on who you are and where you live - you may feel you need - or in fact do need - a gun to protect yourself from the bad guys.

That premise that you are going to defend yourself with a gun from a criminal who also has a gun, and intends to do you bodily harm, means you better be able to use it quicker than they can.

I've always thought a better plan than keeping a heavy pistol in my shirt or a loaded shotgun under the bed would be to be aware of my surroundings, learn self-defense, and use my brain to protect myself and those around me rather than depending on my quick-draw skills. Call me foolish but I don't want to live with the paranoia that the world is such a dangerous place that I need to have a gun nearby at all times (if you use your head there's usually some kind of weapon around you that you could use as a last resort).

"Bad Voodoo's War" - The Iraq War as Seen Through the Eyes of Infantrymen

There's another PBS Frontline show, about the Iraq war coming up on April 1st called Bad Voodoo's War.

According to the preview "captures the realities of war through a "virtual embed" with a National Guard platoon in Iraq."

The show is on Seattle's KCTS Channel 9 on Tuesday April 1st at 9 pm, with reruns on Thursday April 3rd at 10 pm, and Saturday April 5th at 2 am.

This is a video from the show -

A TV Show Every American Citizen Should Watch

The PBS Frontline special "Bush's War", tells the story of how we got into the Iraq war and what has transpired in the five years since that time.

The two-part special series aired on Monday and Tuesday of this week, but you can watch it online and it is rebroadcast at various times in the next couple of weeks.

It's the most riveting and thorough reporting imaginable with a variety of messages about power, corruption, arrogance, egotism, and a mix of groupthink on the part of some members of the Bush administration and vicious destructive internal political infighting on the part of others.

Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely, absolute power combined with a mediocre leader surrounded be arrogant egotistical advisors led to what you will see in the documentary.

It's not new information, but seeing it in the 4 1/2 hour documentary brings it into focus and it is....devastating, brutal, amazing, sad, horrifying...but above all else a lesson we can take to heart and ask ourselves - "how in the hell did we ever let this happen?" and think about how we can ensure it never happens again.

Intervention Gone Horribly Wrong

I was listening to Stephanie Miller's show on KPTK 1090 Seattle's progressive talk radio station today and in a humorous segment she brought up the story of the Ex-Homecoming Queen Accused Of Beating Sister With Prosthetic Leg In Trailer.

What more can you say?

As bizarrely hilarious and sad as that story is, it's not indicative of what you generally hear on KPTK.

I'd recommend listening to Stephanie Miller's show and some of the other hosts, as an antidote to the Fox News echo chamber and as one source to gather viewpoints on current events in our quest to be informed citizens.